 |
 |
Surprise, surprise - what everyone knew would
happen months ago has happened. The National Environmental Appraisal Committee
(NEAC) has given environmental clearance for the Chalillo Dam to proceed. All
government members voted to approve Fortis' Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA), while Belize Alliance of Conservation NGOs (BACONGO), voted against.
This, even though Canadian-owned Fortis, owner of Belize Electricity Ltd. since
1999 and the monopoly supplier of electricity to Belize, stated on CBC radio in
Canada that they would abandon the dam project if the Canadian environmental
assessment found it would cause untoward damage
to the environment. Well guess what? That is
exactly what the EIA stated. Fortis is still
planning to build the $45-$60 million dam even though their own
wildlife consultant, the Natural History Museum of London, has
recommended the dam NOT be built, stating it will cause "significant and irreversible harm to Belizean wildlife". It
further states that the Belizean ratepayers will have to subsidize the high cost
of the dam by paying higher rates. The dam
will stand 50 meters high and will be nearly 350 meters in length. It will flood
a 1,000 hectare area of the Macal River Valley, one of the wildest, un-developed
areas remaining in Central America. Two known undisturbed Mayan ruins, which
contain ancient temples and pyramids will be submerged; one of the sites was
featured in a National Geographic television
documentary. It will destroy the habitat of endangered species and pose serious
risks to all who rely on the Macal River. So
why is Fortis so intent on building this dam? Is it because it will provide
cheaper rates? Is it because it will make Belize energy self-sufficient? Is it
because it will create jobs for Belizeans? Is it because it is the only economic
and viable option for Belize? The answer to all these question is a big NO!
Fortis wants to build the dam for one reason and one reason only-MONEY. Fortis
realizes that with a monopoly they have a captive audience, an audience that
they will totally control for 50 years. They will now control a river, a river
that does not take any of their money to operate. They will control the price
consumer's pay for electricity and they will control the way that electricity is
produced. They have the wonderful option of knowing any mistakes and highly
questionable practices they decide to implement - past, present or future - will
not be paid for by them, but by the people of Belize and sadly, with the present
government's blessing and backing. Can this company
build this dam in Belize even if the majority of Belizeans are against it? Well,
yes and no. The first hurdle they had to jump is approval
from the Government of Belize. Evidently, this was just a minor stepping stone.
On August 2 nd, 2001, before
the EIA was close to completion, before all relevant documents were written and
presented, Prime Minister Musa said of Chalillo, "We want to see it move ahead
and move ahead quickly!" Again in September, at the PUP National Convention, the
PM declared his support of the dam. Recently, a group of over 400 legally
assembled protesters marched on Belmopan to voice their opposition to Chalillo.
They were met by a small group of pro-Chalillo activists (many who said, when
questioned by the media, that they were paid to
be there) assembled in the capital. The PM took that opportunity to join the
pro-Chalillo demonstrators. The rationale for the head of the government of
Belize to join in a demonstration of this type will not be debated here. The
PM's comments, justifying why the dam should be built, will. 1) Lots of jobs for two to three years - No doubt
building a structure like this will create jobs, but are these jobs going to be
filled by Belizean workers or, like Mollejon, will they import Chinese labor? 2)
Flood control - If, as stated, the Chalillo dam
will need to be kept full in order to work, how will it control flooding? Fill
your bathtub with water; when you turn the faucet back on to add more water it
overflows uncontrollably. The only way to stop it is to turn off the faucet.
Who'll stop the rain? 3) Cheaper rates down the road - As it stands the Belizean people are Fortis' biggest profit makers.
Fortis receives $78,500 (Canadian) per giga watt-hour (GWh) from their Canadian
customers; they receive almost a whopping $255,000 (Canadian) per GWh from
Belizean consumers. Does ANYONE honestly believe that this dam will be the
reason this MONOPOLY will lower the cost of electricity? And do not forget, BEL
has also stated it will need to build a third dam at Vaca Falls for all of this
to work. 4) Other economic benefits - Fortis
will spend almost $50 million dollars just to build this dam. The bank they will
secure their loan from does not accept Belize dollars, which means more US
dollars will be needed to satisfy their bank payments. The economic benefits are
clearly all Fortis' and the people on their payroll. 5) Non-dependant on fossil fuel - At perfect, peak
performance Chalillo will put out a mediocre 7.3 megawatts of electricity
(earlier figures quoted 6). According to Ambrose Tillett, the former senior
planner at BEL who was let go from the company in October of 2000, the actual
firm capacity Chalillo will produce on a normal level is only about three
megawatts. And what about the dry season? At best, the dam will make Belize less
dependant not independent on fossil fuel.
During the demonstration, the PM also stated "We see Chalillo as a good thing,
and we want the people of Belize, not foreigners, to decide." This statement is
perplexing. When were the consultations with the people held so they could
decide? When did government solicit the people of the country for their input?
We have heard certain ministers come out for it
and we know the Canadian company Fortis is for it. We have heard the people from
the "rent-a-crowd" were for it, even though when questioned some had no idea
what it was or what it was about, but we have yet to hear from the other 99.9%
of Belizeans. And now, with the government's blessing, it is now
up to foreigners to decide (the stockholders of Fortis). This
statement also alludes to foreigners trying to impose their will on Belize. Do
not let the propaganda or fancy pro-Chalillo T-shirts fool you. The
anti-Chalillo fight is being waged in Canada against a Canadian company, by
Canadians and the international community. Canadians are especially embarrassed
that one of their own billion-dollar companies is trying to do something in
Belize that is completely illegal in their own country. They are ashamed to have
their country's name associated in the rape of another country's environment and
murder of its economy. The information being circulated in Belize by the media
and international community is to let the Belizean people know the plans for
environmental destruction and profit driven greed that are being hoisted on the
public in the guise of the betterment of the people of Belize. The public whose
children and children's children will be saddled with paying for this white
elephant for the next fifty years. If they do not let the public know about the
irresponsible, uncaring and profit driven attitude of this monopoly, who in this
country will? Evidently not the government and certainly not Fortis. After all,
it is not Fortis' country, they do not have to live here, why should they care
if they trash it? They are making money hand-over-fist and leading a "fat cat"
life somewhere else. Now, after the
government has given its blessing to the project before the EIA was completed
and without country-wide consultations with all the people, public hearings are
now being planned. The hearings are to tell the public about the information presented in
the EIA and the decisions made by NEAC, including the conditions upon which
clearance is being granted. So, once again, how was this decision supposed to be
made by the Belizean people? It has been made. These hearings are strictly to
let you know how they plan to control the environmental destruction the dam will
cause. The high rates you will be forced to pay for this dam, whether it works
or not, will probably not be debated. Fortis has stated
if they do not proceed soon, the project will become economically unfeasible.
Economically unfeasible for who? Why all this rush to build this dam when all
the facts, all the documents and all the studies are not available to the NEAC
or the people of Belize? They are gambling the future of this country on an
incomplete document. There are many things this EIA does not address and
there are many problems it points out but offers no alternatives or solutions
for. Why rush to build a facility that will force people to pay higher prices
and destroy a part of Belizean heritage? Have we not learned anything from the
20-year concession given to BTL? Outrageous communication rates, denied access
to modern technology and no option but to take what is given to us and pay
whatever price they decide. Technology is moving ahead by leaps and bounds.
There are many alternative and better sources of energy available now; of
course, these alternatives do not allow a few to profit at the expense of the
many. The reason to rush this project through is simple; once the public is made
aware of all the facts, it will not be allowed
to proceed! The bottom line still remains that Belize
needs an alternative energy source. If one were to make a wish list of things
that would be in the best interest of Belize it might go something like this. An
energy source that was environmentally friendly. An energy source that would
employ Belizeans. An energy source that would not result in a massive drain on
our foreign currency. An energy source that is reliable 365 days of the year. An
energy source that is capable of supplying two to three times the output of the
dam. An energy source that would be a model for the rest of the world. And as
long as we are wishing, how about a source of energy that helps 10,000 Belizeans
stay employed? Well guess what - Santa came early - we have that source right
here in Belize. A bagasse fired electrical power utility at Tower Hill could be
ready by 2003 and deliver 11.5 Megawatts of power to the national grid,
reliably, 365 days of the year. The plant would use an additional eight
Megawatts of electricity to operate the electric motors at the factory. There
would be no need for an EIA since the only emission is carbon dioxide,
which the sugar cane absorbed, being released back into the atmosphere. The
plant would cost $25 million to build (1/2 the price of Chalillo and double the
output). The Minister of Labor and Sugar Industry, the Belize Cane Farmers
Association and the Belize Sugar Workers Union all support this project.
So, you say, that is still not enough
energy for the country; we must stop relying on foreign owned and supplied
power. HELLO! Fortis is a foreign owned company. Just because they build a dam
in your backyard does not change the fact that it is foreign owned and
controlled. You can check every bank in Belize but I doubt you will find their
money deposited here. What you will find is the environment destroyed, the price
of electricity higher and eco-tourism a thing of the past.
There is also another way for Belize to have affordable
electricity which no one in government or Fortis dares mention-OPEN COMPETITION!
After 20 years it is finally being proposed for communication, must we wait 50
years for it to happen with our power needs? The
point is the EIA is incomplete at best. It does not address the cost of
mitigation; it does not address any problems that might affect the communities
downstream. It does not address the cave systems that are in the region. There
are no adequate hydrological studies available to engineers to estimate water
flow at Mollejon and this is still the case for Chalillo! Without this and other pertinent information, how in the world can
anyone make a factual and accurate projection of what this dam will or will not
do? There are too many more concerns it does not take into
account to mention here. Additionally there has been no definitive study of
suitable alternative energy power sources as required by law. There are less
costly options available that produce electricity 365 days of the year, not just
during the rainy season. To rush into something as important as this would be
foolhardy and shortsighted. And to add a new twist, the CEO of Fortis, Stan
Marshall, is feeling the international pressure upon him since he has gone back
on his promise to abandon the dam project if the EIA determined the dam would
irreparably harm the environment. He now says he will abide by the decision of
the Belize government - who came out in support of the dam in
August! If the government has felt, since August,
that the dam was such a good idea for the people why have they not made an
attempt to inform the public of the benefits and the downfalls of this dam. Why
are the people being forced into 50 more years of economic servitude to a
foreign owned utility company, a project that will not empower but enslave the
people? Why is the Belizean consumer - not Fortis being held hostage to
pay off the massive debt regardless if this project works or not? And if, as government
says, they want the Belizean people to be the ones to decide the outcome of this
dam, why are countrywide consultations not being held where both sides of the
issue could be presented and debated? Government MUST put a hold on this project
until all relevant information, reports and final cost analysis are completed
AND countrywide consultations are held. If government and the people are to make
an informed and educated decision regarding this dam, it is the only logical
action to take. If government refuses to do this then they should stop pissing
on our heads and telling us it is raining. We will need some time to find a
second job so we can pay our electric bill.
|
|  |
 |